From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 15 06:15:04 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C29316A4CE; Sat, 15 Jan 2005 06:15:04 +0000 (GMT) Received: from sccimhc92.asp.att.net (sccimhc92.asp.att.net [63.240.76.166]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC48643D1D; Sat, 15 Jan 2005 06:15:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@nbritton.org) Received: from [192.168.1.10] (12-223-129-46.client.insightbb.com[12.223.129.46]) by sccimhc92.asp.att.net (sccimhc92) with ESMTP id <20050115061502i9200isdbke>; Sat, 15 Jan 2005 06:15:03 +0000 Message-ID: <41E8B4E4.4000801@nbritton.org> Date: Sat, 15 Jan 2005 00:15:00 -0600 From: Nikolas Britton User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20041230) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Greg 'groggy' Lehey References: <67.3c455a91.2f19b183@aol.com> <20050115051452.GQ55001@wantadilla.lemis.com> In-Reply-To: <20050115051452.GQ55001@wantadilla.lemis.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: questions@freebsd.org cc: Freebsd0101@aol.com Subject: Re: Kris' World X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 15 Jan 2005 06:15:04 -0000 Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote: >On Friday, 14 January 2005 at 18:36:35 -0500, Freebsd0101@aol.com wrote: > >Do you have a name? > > > >>In a message dated 1/14/05 5:56:01 PM Eastern Standard Time, kris@obsecurity.org writes: >> >> >>>>Why are you abandoning support for new hardware in 4.x when you >>>>admit that 5.x is not ready? It makes no sense at all. >>>> >>>> >>>Jamie, you have a fundamental lack of understanding about how the >>>FreeBSD community works. Unfortunately, this isn't something that can >>>be explained to someone like you, because you have your own fixed >>>ideas about how you think the world works and are not willing to >>>listen to any explanations of how reality differs. >>> >>> >>I know how linux, windows, openbsd and every other major open >>source project works, >> >> > >Hmm. I know the term "windows" is ambiguous, but in the past I've >always seen it used to refer to Microsoft "Windows". What open source >project is called "windows"? > > I see open source when I look out my windows.