Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2005 21:23:41 +0300 From: Roman Bogorodskiy <bogorodskiy@gmail.com> To: Matt Mills <matt_mills@btopenworld.com> Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD Port: blackbox-0.65.0 Message-ID: <20050309182341.GE3801@lame.novel.ru> In-Reply-To: <422DC623.20805@btopenworld.com> References: <20050308115724.B4354@lucifer.troback.com> <422D8865.1080505@btopenworld.com> <422DC623.20805@btopenworld.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--V4b9U9vrdWczvw78 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Matt wrote: > Does anyone know why there is a separate port (x11-wm/boxtools) for the= =20 > bsetbg and bsetroot utilities? These are compiled in the util directory= =20 > of the blackbox source. Having a separate port for them creates extra=20 > work and seems superfluous. Both fluxbox and blackbox comes with that utils. Instead of adding CONFLICTS (bacause of installation of the same files) they use boxtools. It makes possible to have both fluxbox and blackbox installed. -Roman Bogorodskiy --V4b9U9vrdWczvw78 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (FreeBSD) iQCVAwUBQi8/LYB0WzgdqspGAQI86wQAsnSJzNL90W1P47s3zYWB8ry+9aeFPMhB +FLNTf5xRQjxnmgQLFnzuCw7WiJwC9YYL8pZjdGoQLdOW8fnLmFCqS/qQiW3zeC7 gkDV0vqvjvrCdHFjpl3WlEeI0Q+3kn9SPd7UDAaQVaJd5h5zJzJdmQtOnlVBCGol wIIdj5511OY= =I2W1 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --V4b9U9vrdWczvw78--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050309182341.GE3801>