From owner-freebsd-ports  Wed Jun 30  3: 5:55 1999
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from blues.ghis.net (pppc2-58.eisa.net.au [203.166.251.178])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 62B92152A5; Wed, 30 Jun 1999 03:05:30 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from jim@blues.ghis.net)
Received: (from jim@localhost)
	by blues.ghis.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) id UAA22375;
	Wed, 30 Jun 1999 20:05:22 +1000 (EST)
Date: Wed, 30 Jun 1999 20:05:19 +1000
From: Jim Mock <jim@blues.ghis.net>
To: ports@FreeBSD.org
Cc: cpiazza@FreeBSD.org
Subject: xchat port
Message-ID: <19990630200518.A22323@blues.ghis.net>
Reply-To: jim@blues.ghis.net
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
User-Agent: Mutt/0.96.3i
Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org

Hi folks,

I just cvsupped my ports (as I usually do every day or two), and
noticed irc/xchat is still at 0.9.9 even though Chris committed my
patch to upgrade it to 0.9.10 on the 26th (ports/12401).  I also
noticed the Id tag from the current port in the tree..

	# $Id: Makefile,v 1.14 1999/06/28 02:21:21 billf Exp $

It's not a big deal (xchat-1.0.0 came out today and I'll be submitting
a patch shortly).  I'm going to do the diff to 1.0.0 against 0.9.9
which is currently in the tree, so don't bother applying the patch to
0.9.10 from ports/12401 again :-)

At any rate, I just thought it might want to be known in case the same
happened to any other ports.

Later,

-- 
- Jim Mock - jim@blues.ghis.net - systems administrator - ghis.NET -
- work: http://www.ghis.net/ - personal: http://www.ghis.net/~jim/ -
- FreeBSD 'zine: http://www.freebsdzine.org/ - jim@freebsdzine.org -
- FreeBSD: http://advocacy.freebsd.org/ - jim@advocacy.FreeBSD.org -


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message