From owner-freebsd-hackers Wed Aug 26 19:16:21 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id TAA13429 for freebsd-hackers-outgoing; Wed, 26 Aug 1998 19:16:21 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from hp9000.chc-chimes.com (hp9000.chc-chimes.com [206.67.97.84]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id TAA13422 for ; Wed, 26 Aug 1998 19:16:17 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from billf@chc-chimes.com) Received: from localhost by hp9000.chc-chimes.com with SMTP (1.39.111.2/16.2) id AA258740305; Wed, 26 Aug 1998 21:11:45 -0400 Date: Wed, 26 Aug 1998 21:11:45 -0400 (EDT) From: Bill Fumerola Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Imap4 In-Reply-To: <199808270155.LAA01102@cain.gsoft.com.au> Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Thu, 27 Aug 1998, Daniel O'Connor wrote: > On 26 Aug, Lyndon Nerenberg wrote: > > You mean your IMAP server doesn't implement quotas? Let me give you a URL to > > our sales page ... And with the push to thin clients and NC, where else are you going to store > > that mail? Disk is cheap, and the security of having the mail backed up is a big win. > Yes, but if all your users have to keep connecting to your server to > read their old mail its not so good :) (But I don't think thats too > much of a problem, since most people would just get their mail from the > server a la POP3 anyway) Internal traffic is relativly cheap, and it's the users's bandwidth they're hitting. Do you really see yourself doing 1000+ k/s in email traffic? Doubtful. - bill fumerola [root/billf]@chc-chimes.com - computer horizons corp - - ph:(800)252.2421 x128 / bfumerol@computerhorizons.com - BF1560 - "Logic, like whiskey, loses its beneficial effect when taken in too large quantities" -Lord Dunsany To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message