From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 4 17:16:55 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C3931065680 for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2012 17:16:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [89.206.35.99]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB7738FC0C for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2012 17:16:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q54HGqna003655; Mon, 4 Jun 2012 19:16:52 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) with ESMTP id q54HGqWo003652; Mon, 4 Jun 2012 19:16:52 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2012 19:16:52 +0200 (CEST) From: Wojciech Puchar To: Scott Ballantyne In-Reply-To: <20120604152729.67144.qmail@irelay.ssr.com> Message-ID: References: <20120604152729.67144.qmail@irelay.ssr.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender passed SPF test, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [127.0.0.1]); Mon, 04 Jun 2012 19:16:53 +0200 (CEST) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Building youtube-dl from Ports causes trouble? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2012 17:16:55 -0000 > > I updated my ports this morning, built youtube-dl, and after finding definitely not related to youtube-dl. > some software wouldn't work, rebooted. Now X doesn't start, and when I > tried to start emacs, it seems that libpng, required by emacs, has > vanished. > > So my current theory is that I should just rebuild all my ports? I'm > amazed that this could happen, truthfully. unfortunately ports subsystem is far from being good. anyway making it good dealing with today "modern" software with enormous amount of dependencies is just very hard.