From owner-freebsd-security Fri Aug 17 5:25:40 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from titan.parkline.ru (titan.parkline.ru [195.209.63.162]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2638737B40E for ; Fri, 17 Aug 2001 05:25:36 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from aronov@parkline.ru) Received: from ami.gpt.ru (ami.gpt.ru [195.209.50.5]) by titan.parkline.ru (8.9.2/8.9.2) with ESMTP id QAA58074 for ; Fri, 17 Aug 2001 16:25:34 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from aronov@parkline.ru) Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2001 16:24:51 +0400 (MSD) From: Mikhail Aronov X-X-Sender: To: Subject: Re: Silly crackers... NT is for kids... In-Reply-To: <20010817150749.F724@ringworld.oblivion.bg> Message-ID: <20010817161920.O893-100000@ami.gpt.ru> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Aug 17, 2001, Peter Pentchev wrote: >OK, let's not go through this yet one more time.. alright? > >For most cases, anything less than SSH is asking for trouble. >There *are* some cases, though, when telnet is acceptable >(properly protected LAN's), and there are even some cases when telnet >is the only really acceptable way - and yes, I've heard about all kinds >of SSH clients, including Java ones, web-based ones, etc.. but still, >there are cases when one simply has to use telnet, period. > >G'luck, >Peter I can add some more examples when telnet is the only way, but you're right - quite enough. Yours, Mikhail Aronov aronov@parkline.ru To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message