From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 11 23:42:00 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B0C31065670 for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2012 23:42:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from garmitage@swin.edu.au) Received: from gpo4.cc.swin.edu.au (gpo4.cc.swin.edu.au [136.186.1.33]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1D1C8FC17 for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2012 23:41:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [136.186.229.44] (garmitage3.caia.swin.edu.au [136.186.229.44]) by gpo4.cc.swin.edu.au (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id q5BNfv3r021728 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 12 Jun 2012 09:41:58 +1000 Message-ID: <4FD68245.4090207@swin.edu.au> Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2012 09:41:57 +1000 From: grenville armitage User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20111003 Thunderbird/7.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org References: <201206020012.q520CEcf057568@hugeraid.jetcafe.org> <20120602004230.GA14487@in-addr.com> <201206040224.q542OBqk085897@hugeraid.jetcafe.org> <20120604043233.GB32597@lonesome.com> <201206040841.q548fVHa091169@hugeraid.jetcafe.org> <201206041841.q54IfUow001060@hugeraid.jetcafe.org> <20120604191343.GF10783@isuckatdomains.isuckatdomains.net> <201206041932.q54JWONA001600@hugeraid.jetcafe.org> <4FCDA15C.2000700@digsys.bg> <201206061859.q56IxvLx045828@hugeraid.jetcafe.org> <90425E82-5475-491F-AE88-00B0774F058D@ultra-secure.de> <201206112320.q5BNKXWO029603@hugeraid.jetcafe.org> In-Reply-To: <201206112320.q5BNKXWO029603@hugeraid.jetcafe.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Documenting ports options (was Re: Why Are You NOT Using FreeBSD ?) X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2012 23:42:00 -0000 > Rainer Duffner writes: [..] >> Personally, I don't need more frequent FreeBSD-releases but two or >> maybe three ports-tree freezes per year would be good. Perhaps not so much freezes per se, but if there are particular dates at which the ports tree is known to compile properly (for some preferred definition of 'properly') those dates could be kept in a list somewhere, for people to use with the cvsup "date=" option? cheers, gja