From owner-freebsd-ports Mon Mar 29 13:40:19 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.ORG [204.216.27.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A80121515A for ; Mon, 29 Mar 1999 13:40:18 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.9.2/8.9.2) id NAA63974; Mon, 29 Mar 1999 13:40:01 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Date: Mon, 29 Mar 1999 13:40:01 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <199903292140.NAA63974@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Cc: From: Sheldon Hearn Subject: Re: ports/10844: New port: adagdb Reply-To: Sheldon Hearn Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org The following reply was made to PR ports/10844; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Sheldon Hearn To: Daniel Eischen Cc: freebsd-gnats-submit@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ports/10844: New port: adagdb Date: Mon, 29 Mar 1999 23:31:22 +0200 On Mon, 29 Mar 1999 16:26:35 EST, Daniel Eischen wrote: > I don't have access to a -current system until I get home later, > but this port mostly builds under a 2.2.7 system (it gets way past > blockframe.c). Remember that the 2.2 branch isn't a concern for ports anymore. If you can keep a port working for that branch, great. But it shouldn't be your development platform for submissions. Let us know what you find on your CURRENT box. > Have you modified the Makefile in someway so that the patches don't > get applied correctly? Nope, used your port "out-of-the-box". :-) Ciao, Sheldon. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message