From owner-freebsd-current Fri May 25 6:33:48 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from aldan.algebra.com (aldan.algebra.com [216.254.65.224]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3ED7E37B422 for ; Fri, 25 May 2001 06:33:45 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mi@aldan.algebra.com) Received: from aldan.algebra.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by aldan.algebra.com (8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id f4PDYJB40172; Fri, 25 May 2001 09:34:27 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from mi@aldan.algebra.com) Message-Id: <200105251334.f4PDYJB40172@aldan.algebra.com> Date: Fri, 25 May 2001 09:34:16 -0400 (EDT) From: Mikhail Teterin Subject: Re: mount_mfs (Re: smbfs) To: dima@unixfreak.org Cc: kris@obsecurity.org, current@FreeBSD.org In-Reply-To: <20010525033642.726F73E2F@bazooka.unixfreak.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > I actually wrote a short program that emulates *all* of mount_mfs's > umpteen options with md, disklabel, and newfs, but nobody seemed > interested. My choice of name (mount_md) wasn't particuarly good, > either. Look at the -hackers and cvs-all archives around late January > and early February for the discussions. I still have that program, and > it works great, so perhaps I should make it a port (comments?). Why can't that program _replace_ mount_mfs? And assume the name too? -mi To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message