From owner-cvs-all Mon Feb 11 6:31:51 2002 Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from lists.unixathome.org (lists.unixathome.org [210.48.103.158]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8ABF37B400; Mon, 11 Feb 2002 06:31:43 -0800 (PST) Received: from wocker (lists.unixathome.org [210.48.103.158]) by lists.unixathome.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g1BEVfi88777; Tue, 12 Feb 2002 03:31:41 +1300 (NZDT) (envelope-from dan@lists.unixathome.org) Message-Id: <200202111431.g1BEVfi88777@lists.unixathome.org> From: "Dan Langille" Organization: DVL Software Limited To: cvs-committers@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2002 09:31:34 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/security/krb5-beta [...] Reply-To: dan@langille.org In-reply-to: <20020211141814.GX82640@squall.waterspout.com> References: <20020211123735.GA93782@madman.nectar.cc> X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Windows (v4.01) Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-description: Mail message body Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On 11 Feb 2002 at 9:18, Will Andrews wrote: > On Mon, Feb 11, 2002 at 06:37:36AM -0600, Jacques A. Vidrine wrote: > > I'm sorry, but I disagree. For ports with potentially complex > > relationships with other software, a `-beta' port is just what the > > doctor ordered. > > I'm not contesting that, re-read my reply. What I think Will is saying is that you can test "a `-beta' port" without putting it into the ports tree. At least, that's that I do. I test ports all the time which depend upon other software. And said ports never appear in the ports tree, but they do use many port tree entries. -- Dan Langille The FreeBSD Diary - http://freebsddiary.org/ - practical examples To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message