From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Oct 25 00:37:02 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 664531065689 for ; Tue, 25 Oct 2011 00:37:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perryh@pluto.rain.com) Received: from agora.rdrop.com (agora.rdrop.com [IPv6:2607:f678:1010::34]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 411FE8FC12 for ; Tue, 25 Oct 2011 00:37:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from agora.rdrop.com (66@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by agora.rdrop.com (8.13.1/8.12.7) with ESMTP id p9P0awlI085176 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 24 Oct 2011 17:37:01 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from perryh@pluto.rain.com) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by agora.rdrop.com (8.13.1/8.12.9/Submit) with UUCP id p9P0awFd085174; Mon, 24 Oct 2011 17:36:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fbsd81 ([192.168.200.81]) by pluto.rain.com (4.1/SMI-4.1-pluto-M2060407) id AA20173; Mon, 24 Oct 11 17:29:20 PDT Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2011 00:28:04 -0700 From: perryh@pluto.rain.com To: mike@sentex.net Message-Id: <4ea66504.s5gqntrPXpc5ddTl%perryh@pluto.rain.com> References: <20111021110600.GA19417@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru> <20111022053315.GA30712@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru> <20111023161312.GA46735@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru> <20111023162242.GA3823@tinyCurrent> <20111024122448.GA70524@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru> <20111024141404.GA71953@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru> <4EA5765C.20701@sentex.net> In-Reply-To: <4EA5765C.20701@sentex.net> User-Agent: nail 11.25 7/29/05 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: vas@mpeks.tomsk.su, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: strange behavior of restore(8) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2011 00:37:02 -0000 Mike Tancsa wrote: > if there are a lot of files, restore needs quite a bit of RAM. It might need less to "extract" (restore -x) than to "restore" (restore -r) -- but that only works if there's no need to load an incremental afterwards.