From owner-dev-commits-ports-all@freebsd.org Sat Jun 5 17:16:48 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: dev-commits-ports-all@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A37AC646AF3; Sat, 5 Jun 2021 17:16:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danfe@freebsd.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:6074::16:84]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "freefall.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Fy5sD4GKTz3jkl; Sat, 5 Jun 2021 17:16:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danfe@freebsd.org) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=freebsd.org; s=dkim; t=1622913408; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=1/WXdWDwW46wWWpIEiyCjKfiYjhx0cDat5copYuHaok=; b=FU/gWO1h71ZetUu2J3echIaP92xA+TqyhtMpG9BOkKR8VwZLKCoWcYJGPfdQaWUIUpH4cm guKpBZmLmXRTFVAF/VIBdqUtOB1PAp6117dFIQMnvX4C4qcepf+2I9scjA9cLSNVxmZmqg RntRt1M9pa3X3bbWMp78bz8x5uW7Ld1FXLMlp1Cf1ecivE4/BDTQe1V07xvZ+w7O65E6EO JHfbbUkNVjT2Li7m1PulumS0G6LbNJK3pLwmxh75web0dFaSS9QFNCQq5a/Eks3BToPxPg pu+nYdKUYuYBiXqUtAhVfYGRoffEl1zgPshUzikSIS0EsSyOyvi5qXRPSxYQ/g== Received: by freefall.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1033) id 7A74D21DE; Sat, 5 Jun 2021 17:16:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sat, 5 Jun 2021 17:16:48 +0000 From: Alexey Dokuchaev To: Po-Chuan Hsieh , ports-committers@freebsd.org, dev-commits-ports-all@freebsd.org, dev-commits-ports-main@freebsd.org Subject: Re: git: 30e6befe38aa - main - suitesparse-btf: new port for the module BTF of SuiteSparse Message-ID: References: <202105251013.14PADZgA000969@gitrepo.freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=freebsd.org; s=dkim; t=1622913408; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=1/WXdWDwW46wWWpIEiyCjKfiYjhx0cDat5copYuHaok=; b=X+iUS6jB5xwvnqVutrusduly2i0HQd2/fbvt6xfMEaWgwl0IXbWS9CT9UDZYjeGe6nv9my CkJp9k5jv7wRp11m74uQpBvBskxn7mYYnH0lIFF7vWKPLmEqzDrPu1Kg/KyWL1MbbfluRI 1tJpQpB+tYcvsD/jxHbGbrBViSD/svU/1R4cDh2yosZ4jbkp0eqgxdwjf/dk1jUEbF0oGm oC0YLZ7oGfwnK4vUmBUIqBUpRoXE4NS/xlhw4wLKukSxYs9N12xfJjqDX1tQ1v5DTe8bmw 9f04/XgjYrexLPBrFrQXOe0uKFV0scx1OH5jglYJg/EKylBFVHVMg7nbjgu7mg== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=dkim; d=freebsd.org; t=1622913408; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=SOgb9pcF/dMFbiywNmi5cvcuypdqPr8ubUAzfi8Cz72oBb5udowy0ODTmRjWtUGHUaOnH/ YodthTxCtz/JLXkmBJ1qtNvriIklVwd43gHBojRzBl8HcB65ImTElYUPAmOn5cej3za4Ag k8uLxmgDJKCsadMp6RqC3gN6i5pu2Gl1fS2JR3BzezdSYI5KWHQ9QhtNSEe9k4891HAn9I rheqMASZ0rNpCiHTSr/YheG+ivG5kLEaHLxQnuRwLZMQEkSqdAC9aaU2mT6kuyibTXuqIG p+tB0NRcNmZ63KqAWVQ0DNS6NpsI1awkzd9kf3SELwpveIMbLAVva/FDVhS+QA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx1.freebsd.org; none X-BeenThere: dev-commits-ports-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Commit messages for all branches of the ports repository List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 05 Jun 2021 17:16:48 -0000 On Sat, Jun 05, 2021 at 07:02:48PM +0200, Thierry Thomas wrote: > ... > Well, I used for $PORTNAME the naming scheme of upstream. This is also > the names of the directories after the tarball has been extracted. > > But for origin/dir names I used lowercase, as the porter's handbook > recommends. Isn't it the best solution? Not really, no. It does not look unixish. There are few special cases when it is indeed desirable to use upper/mixed cased names, e.g. CPAN packages, Python modules, those things with established naming convention of their own, when we bring lots of them to our ports and want to stay more or less consistent with popular GNU/Linux distributions, but those are isolated groups. For some random unattached port it's almost always better tolower() it. We're Unix, and lowercase is preferred by default. This tradition is commonly seen throughout entire Unix heritage and is omnipresent, be it login names, hier(7), or most APIs. This naturally applies to port and package names. Please don't break this consistency. ./danfe