From owner-freebsd-hackers Tue Apr 9 21:11:16 1996 Return-Path: owner-hackers Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id VAA20435 for hackers-outgoing; Tue, 9 Apr 1996 21:11:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rover.village.org (rover.village.org [204.144.255.49]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id VAA20422 for ; Tue, 9 Apr 1996 21:11:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rover.village.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) with SMTP id WAA18693; Tue, 9 Apr 1996 22:09:26 -0600 Message-Id: <199604100409.WAA18693@rover.village.org> To: Josh MacDonald Subject: Re: GNU binutils port Cc: Robert Withrow , hackers@freebsd.org In-reply-to: Your message of Tue, 09 Apr 1996 20:15:29 PDT Date: Tue, 09 Apr 1996 22:09:25 -0600 From: Warner Losh Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk : This, and the claim that gcc 'compiles out of the box' is just not true! For the domain that I was talking about, Cross Coompilation, gcc compiles out of the box w/o a hassle. At least for the half dozen cross compilers that I've built. Haven't built a C++ one, however. Warner