From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 5 21:31:42 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 685D616A422 for ; Sun, 5 Mar 2006 21:31:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: from tim.des.no (tim.des.no [194.63.250.121]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D5F043D46 for ; Sun, 5 Mar 2006 21:31:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: from tim.des.no (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spam.des.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11E182081; Sun, 5 Mar 2006 22:31:34 +0100 (CET) X-Spam-Tests: AWL,BAYES_00,FORGED_RCVD_HELO X-Spam-Learn: ham X-Spam-Score: -2.4/3.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.0 (2005-09-13) on tim.des.no Received: from xps.des.no (des.no [80.203.243.180]) by tim.des.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 915542080; Sun, 5 Mar 2006 22:31:33 +0100 (CET) Received: by xps.des.no (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 0FFF333C1D; Sun, 5 Mar 2006 22:31:32 +0100 (CET) From: des@des.no (Dag-Erling =?iso-8859-1?Q?Sm=F8rgrav?=) To: pfgshield-freebsd@yahoo.com References: <20060305161430.54416.qmail@web32715.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Date: Sun, 05 Mar 2006 22:31:32 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20060305161430.54416.qmail@web32715.mail.mud.yahoo.com> (pfgshield-freebsd@yahoo.com's message of "Sun, 5 Mar 2006 17:14:30 +0100 (CET)") Message-ID: <86oe0kwpcb.fsf@xps.des.no> User-Agent: Gnus/5.110003 (No Gnus v0.3) Emacs/21.3 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: Divacky Roman , freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Subversion? (Re: HEADS UP: Importing csup into base) X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 05 Mar 2006 21:31:42 -0000 writes: > but there's no release yet and of course people will wonder when it will = be as > stable as GNU CVS. I do agree the change would/will make sense though, an= d we > should get rid of GNU readline too. GNU readline is required by other GNU software in the tree (like gdb). We have our own line-editing library (editline) which should be used for all non-GNU software. ISTR that Vinum is the only non-GNU software in our tree that uses readline instead of editline, but this may have changed. DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav - des@des.no