Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2018 15:35:05 -0700 From: Navdeep Parhar <np@FreeBSD.org> To: Marius Halden <marius.h@lden.org>, freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cxl nic not working after reboot Message-ID: <1abe3063-3a2f-2eac-2246-f8dea30867e5@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <ba998b8e-d54c-667d-b0bb-8a6b7a566f05@FreeBSD.org> References: <1535379569.2132387.1487489784.45227861@webmail.messagingengine.com> <20180827151302.GA10167@ox> <1535395530.234212.1487804896.64257978@webmail.messagingengine.com> <1535448912.3229649.1488521184.1EE83C33@webmail.messagingengine.com> <20180829062843.GA25476@ox> <1535538153.459716.1489861176.29777B66@webmail.messagingengine.com> <1535628110.3034153.1491191792.12397BCF@webmail.messagingengine.com> <8bb881ef-a701-1c94-3598-79a2724fa648@FreeBSD.org> <1535665888.3128528.1491873424.5CEF9F3A@webmail.messagingengine.com> <ba998b8e-d54c-667d-b0bb-8a6b7a566f05@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 8/30/18 3:14 PM, Navdeep Parhar wrote: > On 8/30/18 2:51 PM, Marius Halden wrote: >> On Thu, Aug 30, 2018, at 19:27, Navdeep Parhar wrote: >>> On 8/30/18 4:21 AM, Marius Halden wrote: >>>> I tried to downgrade to a the previous bsdrp version we were running= based on 11.1-RELEASE-p10, but it did not start working again. ifconfig = output and t5nex0 devlog follows (non-working state), but it all looks fi= ne to me (media has always been reported wrong). I did notice though that= "hw_mac_init_port[0], =E2=80=A6" will always be logged when it works but= not when when it doesn't work. I confirmed this on a box still running t= he old version which functions as intended. >>>> >>>> The ones not working has a newer firmware version than the ones work= ing. >>>> >>>> Non-working: >>>> # sysctl dev.t5nex.0.firmware_version >>>> dev.t5nex.0.firmware_version: 1.19.1.0 >>>> >>>> >>>> Working: >>>> # sysctl dev.t5nex.0.firmware_version >>>> dev.t5nex.0.firmware_version: 1.16.45.0 >>>> >>>> Any other ideas? >>>> >>> >>> I'm still looking into it. The current working theory is that the pe= er >>> is trying to autonegotiate when it shouldn't (it's 1Gbps optics). If= >>> you know how to disable AN on the peer this should be easy to test. >> >> Thanks. Unfortunately we don't have access to the peer as that's our I= SPs router. According to the sysctl autonegotiate is not supported on our= side. >> >=20 > I'll get a couple of 1G optics in a day or so and then I'll be able to > try some things for myself. Wait for that or try a 1G TWINAX (copper) > SFP+ cable in case you have one -- that should be able to link up (if Sorry, this won't work either. At 1G, AN is done only for -BT (RJ45) copper cables, not for SFP+ TWINAX copper. Regards, Navdeep
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1abe3063-3a2f-2eac-2246-f8dea30867e5>