From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Jun 23 01:17:18 2008
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30AFC1065689;
	Mon, 23 Jun 2008 01:17:18 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from davidxu@freebsd.org)
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org
	[IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03A3B8FC2C;
	Mon, 23 Jun 2008 01:17:18 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from davidxu@freebsd.org)
Received: from apple.my.domain (root@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m5N1HFU9024005;
	Mon, 23 Jun 2008 01:17:16 GMT (envelope-from davidxu@freebsd.org)
Message-ID: <485EF9FD.2010808@freebsd.org>
Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 09:18:53 +0800
From: David Xu <davidxu@freebsd.org>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (X11/20080612)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Ed Schouten <ed@80386.nl>
References: <485B7FFC.4040509@FreeBSD.org> <485B884A.70006@freebsd.org>
	<20080621232301.GU93496@hoeg.nl>
In-Reply-To: <20080621232301.GU93496@hoeg.nl>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: FreeBSD Current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: execvpe port breakage
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 01:17:18 -0000

Ed Schouten wrote:
> David,
> 
> * David Xu <davidxu@freebsd.org> wrote:
>> Looks like the application defined its own version of execvpe() ?
>> I think we should change name execvpe in our header file to something
>> else to avoid conflict.
> 
> What do you think about the attached patch?
> 
> 

Looks good to me.