From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 16 16:53:14 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B444216A919 for ; Tue, 16 May 2006 16:53:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from brett@lariat.org) Received: from lariat.net (lariat.net [65.122.236.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 177B943DCF for ; Tue, 16 May 2006 16:52:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from brett@lariat.org) Received: from Anne (IDENT:ppp1000.lariat.net@lariat.net [65.122.236.2]) by lariat.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA14153; Tue, 16 May 2006 10:52:44 -0600 (MDT) X-message-flag: Warning! Use of Microsoft Outlook renders your system susceptible to Internet worms. Message-Id: <7.0.1.0.2.20060516104907.08788ad8@lariat.org> X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.0.1.0 Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 10:52:26 -0600 To: Randy Rowe , plamen.stoev@gmail.com From: Brett Glass In-Reply-To: <4469C668.2060807@rerowe.com> References: <200605160135.TAA04838@lariat.net> <57d710000605151942p2461338au561269fc5937aee7@mail.gmail.com> <7.0.1.0.2.20060515225038.08d72690@lariat.org> <446981CD.5000309@gmail.com> <4469C668.2060807@rerowe.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Cc: pete wright , stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 4.11 snapshots? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 16:53:37 -0000 At 09:19 AM 5/16/2006, Randy Rowe wrote: >Also at the bottom of that page under the FAQ heading it spells out >where to get the older snapshots :-) Alas, those snapshots are old indeed. The latest is from August of last year! There does not seem to be a snapshot of the 4.11 security branch available with the latest patches -- especially the Sendmail patch. Since 4.xx is still in such widespread use, it does seem to me that one of those sites ought to have a build with the latest patches -- if for no other reason than to prevent people from picking up the older ones and leaving their machines vulnerable. --Brett Glass