From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon May 27 23:15:58 2013
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115])
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F778EBA
 for <ports@freebsd.org>; Mon, 27 May 2013 23:15:58 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from rwmaillists@googlemail.com)
Received: from mail-wi0-x236.google.com (mail-wi0-x236.google.com
 [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::236])
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0802029D
 for <ports@freebsd.org>; Mon, 27 May 2013 23:15:57 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-wi0-f182.google.com with SMTP id c10so1956759wiw.9
 for <ports@freebsd.org>; Mon, 27 May 2013 16:15:57 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=googlemail.com; s=20120113;
 h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer
 :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
 bh=y/GXuSAv2eZvgOi1QEBbkAFQTszvEGL3ayV9fW2qEho=;
 b=k7zRigIdBqdI2NKpSeavYyXO4C5fwjI2KdS7H0Px0XwkfM0vbon85dUg+++xpjyhxp
 3NaSJUPF0Hzc+1gK9UJzMkmJx7r3LFAYStxmVd1kostnxzMS+gdX5VGqRudJaSS1t8FG
 LbTubnu8bG9RFXO6neatzPbggXUed3FoqN44nHhDoPlUn2pcLE9heqbNRLSb/7FrgNop
 4/KEJH2nZ9frEhkTCdgurcMHLASujLCe7wyGVWvt9jcg8hhViINsj2kGHf3biaTiiFlW
 tsUB3ZqJ0LfiGnbSNYJl6QeSM898T+X3oXHf9IhaIJ0zGW2Z34gkEjNKKr333PqiVahq
 bxfg==
X-Received: by 10.181.13.229 with SMTP id fb5mr9797470wid.16.1369696557109;
 Mon, 27 May 2013 16:15:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gumby.homeunix.com (87-194-105-247.bethere.co.uk.
 [87.194.105.247])
 by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id en3sm20698050wid.1.2013.05.27.16.15.56
 for <ports@freebsd.org> (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128);
 Mon, 27 May 2013 16:15:56 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Tue, 28 May 2013 00:15:55 +0100
From: RW <rwmaillists@googlemail.com>
To: ports@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Is latest portsnap snapshot corrupted?
Message-ID: <20130528001555.1f14c42c@gumby.homeunix.com>
In-Reply-To: <51A3CCF1.2080706@cran.org.uk>
References: <1369665048044-5815448.post@n5.nabble.com>
 <CAA96eVvU0bU7-RVZE9RviZOrd05qC8q0aRLsJJ7AT=Qk_s6ecQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <1369679542074-5815520.post@n5.nabble.com>
 <20130528001340.393804429748c30d19c02ce3@gmail.com>
 <51A3CCF1.2080706@cran.org.uk>
X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.9.0 (GTK+ 2.24.17; amd64-portbld-freebsd10.0)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-9
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-ports>,
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 May 2013 23:15:58 -0000

On Mon, 27 May 2013 22:15:29 +0100
Bruce Cran wrote:

> On 27/05/2013 22:13, G=F6k=FEin Akdeniz wrote:
> > Ia am not a dev, but portstree snapshot is fixed. Simply run
> >
> > '# portsnap fetch extract && portsdb -u'
> >
> > and you will get a fresh snapshot of ports tree.
> >
>=20
> Is '# portsnap fetch update' not sufficient? It seemed to work here.
>=20

Extract shouldn't be needed, the problem was in the snapshot, not the
portstree.