From owner-freebsd-questions Tue Jan 21 10:55:11 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) id KAA05501 for questions-outgoing; Tue, 21 Jan 1997 10:55:11 -0800 (PST) Received: from gdi.uoregon.edu (gdi.uoregon.edu [128.223.170.30]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) with ESMTP id KAA05496 for ; Tue, 21 Jan 1997 10:55:09 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (dwhite@localhost) by gdi.uoregon.edu (8.8.4/8.6.12) with SMTP id KAA24195; Tue, 21 Jan 1997 10:54:57 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 21 Jan 1997 10:54:57 -0800 (PST) From: Doug White X-Sender: dwhite@localhost Reply-To: Doug White To: "Gregory A. Gilliss" cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 3C589 'C' and 3C589 'D' In-Reply-To: <199701190606.WAA00885@localhost.netpublishing.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-questions@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On Sat, 18 Jan 1997, Gregory A. Gilliss wrote: > The card that works is a 3c589 'C'; the failure is a 'D' that I bought new. They upgraded it *again*? The C just came out in September! Apparently they changed something in the D rev that zp can't grok. You'll probably need to load on the PAO distribution; it's much more robust than the straight zp0 driver. Does it work under DOS/Win95 okay? Doug White | University of Oregon Internet: dwhite@resnet.uoregon.edu | Residence Networking Assistant http://gladstone.uoregon.edu/~dwhite | Computer Science Major