Date: Sun, 7 Oct 2012 20:29:41 -0400 From: Eitan Adler <lists@eitanadler.com> To: Michael Gmelin <freebsd@grem.de> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: General usefulness of option descriptions Message-ID: <CAF6rxgnEKmA8y7hLODn6=FaTA50OQbSMt38ULEcqtK4uOXFAGw@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20121007152428.11a6172e@bsd64.grem.de> References: <20121007152428.11a6172e@bsd64.grem.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 7 October 2012 09:24, Michael Gmelin <freebsd@grem.de> wrote: > Hi, > > This probably has been discussed before, but I think in many cases > using the default descriptions of OptionsNG is more harm than good. ... FWIW, I just want to say, I completely agree with the content of your email. It isn't always clear when to use the global options and when to overide options. In this case the custom options are likely better, but it remains to be seen how this file evolves. -- Eitan Adler
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAF6rxgnEKmA8y7hLODn6=FaTA50OQbSMt38ULEcqtK4uOXFAGw>