From owner-freebsd-acpi@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 26 09:54:25 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D05B10656DD for ; Tue, 26 May 2009 09:54:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rea-fbsd@codelabs.ru) Received: from 0.mx.codelabs.ru (0.mx.codelabs.ru [144.206.177.45]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DD5E8FC2E for ; Tue, 26 May 2009 09:54:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rea-fbsd@codelabs.ru) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=simple; s=one; d=codelabs.ru; h=Received:Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:Reply-To:References:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To:Sender; b=SwTMlJi5e/qrYZfZzsA5LbB78YI+Ch4DpgZWvpnAA09Ayyf4T7XH7zDGXK06zFyW7GO37gvM72T7YKgz27tLSYa0T8SdC1HuzV9lO1CIW8MZ2J3N5K0Xm0k4rEwajHcsp4167ci4vdAcJiJU8htHDTOn2REWUmcr8NAj/mspX4c=; Received: from void.codelabs.ru (void.codelabs.ru [144.206.177.25]) by 0.mx.codelabs.ru with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) id 1M8tMV-000Ebe-Ic; Tue, 26 May 2009 13:54:23 +0400 Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 13:54:21 +0400 From: Eygene Ryabinkin To: Rui Paulo Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: rea-fbsd@codelabs.ru Cc: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [rea-fbsd@codelabs.ru: Patch for "device_attach: estX attach returned 6" on half of the cores] X-BeenThere: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: rea-fbsd@codelabs.ru List-Id: ACPI and power management development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 09:54:26 -0000 Rui, good day. Tue, May 26, 2009 at 01:16:37AM +0100, Rui Paulo wrote: > > If someone have ACPI tables with processor aliases -- the patch can > > help > > to attach est instances. I'd appreciate any testing and may be some > > knowledgeable person can review this and help to commit the patch. > > Regarding to the code in the patch, is this your code or something > from a more recent ACPI-CA? It's mine ;)) Though I hadn't looked at the newer ACPI-CA yet. > If it is your code, could you please try to submit this upstream? Will try. I had tried to subscribe to the mailing list at http://lists.acpica.org/mailman/listinfo/devel but their host certificate is revoked(!). Moreover, list archives end at February 2009. May be there are some other points of discuission about ACPI-CA? Bugzilla seems to work and I had applied for the account. Will see... > In any case the patch looks good. Thanks! So, I think that I will split the diff into ACPI-CA part and to the FreeBSD-specific part. I'll try to push the first one to the upstream and the second will wait for its inclusion and import. I foresee that this will last for some months. Perhaps once the patch will be accepted upstream it can be also integrated to the FreeBSD sources (and dropped with the next ACPI-CA import)? -- Eygene _ ___ _.--. # \`.|\..----...-'` `-._.-'_.-'` # Remember that it is hard / ' ` , __.--' # to read the on-line manual )/' _/ \ `-_, / # while single-stepping the kernel. `-'" `"\_ ,_.-;_.-\_ ', fsc/as # _.-'_./ {_.' ; / # -- FreeBSD Developers handbook {_.-``-' {_/ #