From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 3 06:04:16 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: current@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B1A516A41C; Sun, 3 Jul 2005 06:04:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from chat95@mac.com) Received: from smtpout.mac.com (smtpout.mac.com [17.250.248.89]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7231443D46; Sun, 3 Jul 2005 06:04:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from chat95@mac.com) Received: from mac.com (smtpin01-en2 [10.13.10.146]) by smtpout.mac.com (Xserve/8.12.11/smtpout02/MantshX 4.0) with ESMTP id j6332iHt016074; Sat, 2 Jul 2005 20:02:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (yahoobb219196184005.bbtec.net [219.196.184.5]) (authenticated bits=0) by mac.com (Xserve/smtpin01/MantshX 4.0) with ESMTP id j6332dow019025; Sat, 2 Jul 2005 20:02:43 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 03 Jul 2005 12:02:28 +0900 (JST) Message-Id: <20050703.120228.18306527.chat95@mac.com> To: kris@obsecurity.org From: NAKATA Maho In-Reply-To: <20041103212237.GA10524@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <20041103210949.GA2329@laptoxa.toxa.lan> <20041103212237.GA10524@xor.obsecurity.org> Organization: private X-Mailer: Mew version 3.3 on Emacs 21.3 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: ports@freebsd.org, current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: native openoffice 1.1.3 package? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Jul 2005 06:04:16 -0000 In Message-ID: <20041103212237.GA10524@xor.obsecurity.org> Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Thu, Nov 04, 2004 at 12:09:49AM +0300, Toxa wrote: > > On ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-6-current/All/ > > we have *-openoffice-1.1.3.tbz for many languages, but what about native > > openoffice package build? Moreover, there's no ru-openoffice-1.1.3.tbz here. > > I'm just wondering about it because OpenOffice-1.1.3 doesn't compiles > > neither on current nor on 5_stable > > The openoffice builds are problematic because they take so long, and > they often time out on the package build cluster (i.e. when multiple > OO builds end up being scheduled on the same machine). Fixing this > properly will require some nontrivial work. I removed all localized ports to reduce such kind of problems. Toxa : still you can build with make LOCALIZED_LANG=ru for russian. i post an e-mail message but I've never recieved a message like `please keep my language'. so I decided I'll never add a localized port. (if you like a mess you can add by raising PR) see my HEADS-UP http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/getmsg.cgi?fetch=25587+0+archive/2005/freebsd-openoffice/20050529.freebsd-openoffice see /usr/ports/editors/openoffice-1.1-devel/files/Makefile.localized for what languages are available. -- NAKATA, Maho (maho@FreeBSD.org)