From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Dec 13 10:22:49 2011
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A121F1065672;
	Tue, 13 Dec 2011 10:22:49 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from adrian.chadd@gmail.com)
Received: from mail-vx0-f182.google.com (mail-vx0-f182.google.com
	[209.85.220.182])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A0828FC17;
	Tue, 13 Dec 2011 10:22:48 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by vcbfk1 with SMTP id fk1so7670449vcb.13
	for <multiple recipients>; Tue, 13 Dec 2011 02:22:48 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
	h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date
	:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;
	bh=ZX6KqOeJ20evUcl6Cqd6lqgE4dxILwyIbQ+sbvlpRng=;
	b=b+if3omSbxdzMRidkCt2TljuSzNNZXoCMYHDOhRUqjArbxZChUgwSBPgUDyAXayK3l
	vm2mZh0iQVBnmIV7x3GBxWJIcbRmuvH4N/a12Bcy+nSeYAIL2Rf56pEYgNlSX71d7p8E
	rjngzQjC5WO5c3vdJWVU8Hlj4onsk3Kb7JUOE=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.220.230.67 with SMTP id jl3mr1004355vcb.60.1323771768334; Tue,
	13 Dec 2011 02:22:48 -0800 (PST)
Sender: adrian.chadd@gmail.com
Received: by 10.52.26.50 with HTTP; Tue, 13 Dec 2011 02:22:48 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <20111213090051.GA3339@vniz.net>
References: <4EE1EAFE.3070408@m5p.com> <4EE22421.9060707@gmail.com>
	<4EE6060D.5060201@mail.zedat.fu-berlin.de>
	<4EE69C5A.3090005@FreeBSD.org>
	<20111213104048.40f3e3de@nonamehost.>
	<20111213090051.GA3339@vniz.net>
Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2011 02:22:48 -0800
X-Google-Sender-Auth: Z0I2tEWuW7JTpBYJ2eEndqbOV5U
Message-ID: <CAJ-Vmo=y44c2Lek058Rc=thVb+gzu2fm7i0vMHipiGGHC086Yw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org>
To: Andrey Chernov <ache@freebsd.org>, Ivan Klymenko <fidaj@ukr.net>,
	Doug Barton <dougb@freebsd.org>, 
	"O. Hartmann" <ohartman@mail.zedat.fu-berlin.de>, 
	Current FreeBSD <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, 
	freebsd-performance@freebsd.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Cc: 
Subject: Re: SCHED_ULE should not be the default
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2011 10:22:49 -0000

On 13 December 2011 01:00, Andrey Chernov <ache@freebsd.org> wrote:

>> If the algorithm ULE does not contain problems - it means the problem
>> has Core2Duo, or in a piece of code that uses the ULE scheduler.
>
> I observe ULE interactivity slowness even on single core machine (Pentium
> 4) in very visible places, like 'ps ax' output stucks in the middle by ~1
> second. When I switch back to SHED_4BSD, all slowness is gone.

Are you able to provide KTR traces of the scheduler results? Something
that can be fed to schedgraph?


Adrian