From owner-freebsd-current Wed May 13 21:59:21 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id VAA05977 for freebsd-current-outgoing; Wed, 13 May 1998 21:59:21 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from parkplace.cet.co.jp (parkplace.cet.co.jp [202.32.64.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id VAA05972 for ; Wed, 13 May 1998 21:59:19 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from michaelh@cet.co.jp) Received: from localhost (michaelh@localhost) by parkplace.cet.co.jp (8.8.8/CET-v2.2) with SMTP id EAA00847; Thu, 14 May 1998 04:58:16 GMT Date: Thu, 14 May 1998 13:58:16 +0900 (JST) From: Michael Hancock To: John Birrell cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Undefined symbol "___error" In-Reply-To: <199805140324.NAA22813@cimlogic.com.au> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Thu, 14 May 1998, John Birrell wrote: > No, it's "relinked" so that a program will know to use the later libc. > The problem here is not that the libc major number needs to be bumped, > but *all* other libraries that use errno.h need a major number bump. > Bruce pointed this out. > > Bruce wants the change backed out. I haven't heard from anyone else. > Should I bump the major number of all the shared libraries in the > FreeBSD tree? Should I back out the change and forget about making future > objects thread-aware? Should I do nothing? Rre there any other pending changes that can bundled with the major number bump? We do need things to adjust for threads. Regards, Mike Hancock To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message