From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Aug 25 08:56:54 2003
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 9521416A4BF; Mon, 25 Aug 2003 08:56:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from harmony.village.org (rover.bsdimp.com [204.144.255.66])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 5053B43F93; Mon, 25 Aug 2003 08:56:53 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com)
Received: from localhost (warner@rover2.village.org [10.0.0.1])
	by harmony.village.org (8.12.9/8.12.3) with ESMTP id h7PFupwN025623;
	Mon, 25 Aug 2003 09:56:51 -0600 (MDT)
	(envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com)
Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2003 09:55:31 -0600 (MDT)
Message-Id: <20030825.095531.80210887.imp@bsdimp.com>
To: wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu
From: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com>
In-Reply-To: <200308251542.h7PFgXIV093334@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu>
References: <200308181854.h7IIshJg098625@apollo.backplane.com>
	<20030824230439.GA4954@HAL9000.homeunix.com>
	<200308251542.h7PFgXIV093334@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu>
X-Mailer: Mew version 2.1 on Emacs 21.3 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
cc: das@freebsd.org
cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
cc: re@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: 64 bit quantities in statfs ?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2003 15:56:54 -0000

In message: <200308251542.h7PFgXIV093334@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu>
            Garrett Wollman <wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> writes:
: In order to grow statfs() we need to rev libc.  It might be
: appropriate to do that in the 5.2 time frame, if we are still
: anticipating that 5.2 will be the -stable crossover point.  RE team?

I think that we've said in the past that we bump the libc rev once per
release, and that's already been done for current.  So this should be
able to be rolled into libc w/o any bump.

Warner