From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Dec 27 16:36:29 2006
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: ports@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67D8816A407;
	Wed, 27 Dec 2006 16:36:29 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from wmoran@collaborativefusion.com)
Received: from mx00.pub.collaborativefusion.com
	(mx00.pub.collaborativefusion.com [206.210.89.199])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1629713C47E;
	Wed, 27 Dec 2006 16:36:28 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from wmoran@collaborativefusion.com)
Received: from vanquish.pgh.priv.collaborativefusion.com
	(vanquish.pgh.priv.collaborativefusion.com [192.168.2.61])
	(SSL: TLSv1/SSLv3,256bits,AES256-SHA)
	by wingspan with esmtp; Wed, 27 Dec 2006 11:36:28 -0500
	id 00056445.4592A10C.0000A9DD
Date: Wed, 27 Dec 2006 11:36:28 -0500
From: Bill Moran <wmoran@collaborativefusion.com>
To: Jeremy Chadwick <koitsu@FreeBSD.org>
Message-Id: <20061227113628.d148039f.wmoran@collaborativefusion.com>
In-Reply-To: <20061227161318.GA37308@icarus.home.lan>
References: <20061226173950.0412f4bc.wmoran@collaborativefusion.com>
	<20061227032400.GD2029@charon.picobyte.net>
	<20061227102419.0a7cb6a5.wmoran@collaborativefusion.com>
	<20061227161318.GA37308@icarus.home.lan>
Organization: Collaborative Fusion
X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.2.10 (GTK+ 2.10.6; i386-portbld-freebsd6.1)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: ports@freebsd.org, Shaun Amott <shaun@FreeBSD.org>
Subject: Re: fetch-recursive broken?  Is this a ports issue or just a
 problem with the PostgreSQL port?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Dec 2006 16:36:29 -0000

In response to Jeremy Chadwick <koitsu@FreeBSD.org>:

> On Wed, Dec 27, 2006 at 10:24:19AM -0500, Bill Moran wrote:
> > In response to Shaun Amott <shaun@FreeBSD.org>:
> > 
> > > On Tue, Dec 26, 2006 at 05:39:50PM -0500, Bill Moran wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > Why should the fetch-recursive target care what's installed?  Hell, I just
> > > > want the distfile on the server so I can install it on other machines.
> > > 
> > > I agree. Perhaps we should automatically set NO_IGNORE and TRYBROKEN for
> > > the fetch-recursive target.
> > 
> > I'm getting lost in all the Makefiles trying to cobble together a patch
> > to submit.  Anyone familiar enough with the ports tree to do so, or at
> > least point me in the correct direction?
> 
> Bill,
> 
> This will probably require the expertise of someone who's familiar
> with the Mk/bsd.port.mk framework.  I can confirm what you're
> reporting, though (and have also wondered about it myself...)
> 
> Also, does "make fetch" work (vs. "make fetch-recursive") ?

"make fetch" appears to behave identically to "make fetch-recursive".

It gives the same error, at least.

-- 
Bill Moran
Collaborative Fusion Inc.