From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Sep  2 10:02:09 2010
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: hackers@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F56C10656B0
	for <hackers@freebsd.org>; Thu,  2 Sep 2010 10:02:09 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from des@des.no)
Received: from smtp.des.no (smtp.des.no [194.63.250.102])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31F3D8FC16
	for <hackers@freebsd.org>; Thu,  2 Sep 2010 10:02:09 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from ds4.des.no (des.no [84.49.246.2])
	by smtp.des.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4AFBC1FFC34;
	Thu,  2 Sep 2010 10:02:08 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by ds4.des.no (Postfix, from userid 1001)
	id 235B5845DC; Thu,  2 Sep 2010 12:02:08 +0200 (CEST)
From: =?utf-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=C3=B8rgrav?= <des@des.no>
To: Xin LI <delphij@gmail.com>
References: <86bp8h5mn6.fsf@ds4.des.no>
	<AANLkTimbj2keVzpHC5CHP6buxg=RRu8FsWL4QK0g-K80@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 02 Sep 2010 12:02:08 +0200
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTimbj2keVzpHC5CHP6buxg=RRu8FsWL4QK0g-K80@mail.gmail.com>
	(Xin LI's message of "Wed, 1 Sep 2010 13:07:19 -0700")
Message-ID: <86d3swmpjz.fsf@ds4.des.no>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (berkeley-unix)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: hackers@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: /stand/camcontrol
X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD
	<freebsd-hackers.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-hackers>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers>,
	<mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Sep 2010 10:02:09 -0000

Xin LI <delphij@gmail.com> writes:
> My 2 cents: I think we don't really need to care about the size for
> rescue binary after the splitfs VFS layer have been introduced to
> libstand?  Build of release split MFSROOT was 2006-ish and I feel that
> this can be gone.

This is /stand, not /rescue; /rescue has a full camcontrol.

DES
--=20
Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav - des@des.no