From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Jan 29 14:49:22 2008
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B618616A41A
	for <ports@freebsd.org>; Tue, 29 Jan 2008 14:49:22 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from VIVEK@KHERA.ORG)
Received: from yertle.kcilink.com (thingy.kcilink.com [74.92.149.59])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CB9213C46A
	for <ports@freebsd.org>; Tue, 29 Jan 2008 14:49:22 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from VIVEK@KHERA.ORG)
Received: from host-121.int.kcilink.com (host-121.int.kcilink.com
	[192.168.7.121])
	by yertle.kcilink.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87BE78A009
	for <ports@freebsd.org>; Tue, 29 Jan 2008 09:49:21 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: <9806ECDB-8BB8-4DDD-8F6A-475042A9999E@KHERA.ORG>
From: Vivek Khera <VIVEK@KHERA.ORG>
To: ports@freebsd.org
In-Reply-To: <479E93C7.5080000@FreeBSD.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v915)
Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2008 09:49:21 -0500
References: <7CD44FC1-5B20-4954-8FD9-0F0572B92048@KHERA.ORG>
	<20080128205814.GB50513@goofy.cultdeadsheep.org>
	<479E93C7.5080000@FreeBSD.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.915)
Cc: 
Subject: Re: change in apache port configuration options
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2008 14:49:22 -0000


On Jan 28, 2008, at 9:47 PM, Doug Barton wrote:

> Clement Laforet wrote:
>
>> WITH_BERKELEYDB is now deprecated in favor of WITH_BDB in order to
>> make BDB support consistent with the rest of the ports tree.
>
> Is there a warning generated for users that have the old one  
> defined? If not it would be a good idea to add one. In the past when  
> I've changed variable names in my ports I've added compatibility  
> shims for about 6 months, then warnings for another 6, then dropped  
> support for the old names.

It only fails if you use WITH_BDB_VER to set WITH_BERKELEYDB for the  
apache port like I did.  However, this has been fixed in the latest  
update to the Apache ports, from what I understand.  There was code to  
try to do the right thing, but it had a minor bug which I tripped.