From owner-freebsd-hackers Thu Nov 7 16:23:51 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3FFA37B401 for ; Thu, 7 Nov 2002 16:23:50 -0800 (PST) Received: from host4.rpi.wulimasters.net (host4.rpi.wulimasters.net [128.113.36.114]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9892643E4A for ; Thu, 7 Nov 2002 16:23:49 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dolemite@host4.rpi.wulimasters.net) Received: (qmail 87401 invoked by uid 1001); 8 Nov 2002 00:25:25 -0000 Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2002 00:25:25 +0000 From: Alex Newman To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Netgraph could be a router also. Message-ID: <20021108002525.GC86846@host4.rpi.wulimasters.net> Reply-To: dolemite@wuli.nu References: <20021108000159.GE86595@host4.rpi.wulimasters.net> <3DCB0240.C61DD2E7@mindspring.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3DCB0240.C61DD2E7@mindspring.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > > Could we implement {bgp & ospf} in netgraph? > > What would need to be done assuming the Netgraph TCP/IP happen? > > Is this a bad idea. > > Yes, you could do this. > > The Netgraph TCP/IP is a good idea for research work, but a bad > idea for general implementation purposes, since it's performance > will be very poor, compared to a monolithic TCP/IP implementation. > Interesting, why is click so fast then? What does it have that netgraph doesn't. Just in case http://pdos.lcs.mit.edu then click on click(hehe). Alex Newman To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message