Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2007 12:42:41 -0400 From: "Victor Subervi" <victorsubervi@gmail.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Low Level Language Suggestions: OT Message-ID: <4dc0cfea0712310842i6b24bbcaw3ab44d19a3bf96ef@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4dc0cfea0712310842o49b24abdl9ec10b4af124e373@mail.gmail.com> References: <4dc0cfea0712310757u7a970bb0rb2b29a931ad9767b@mail.gmail.com> <477918B3.4090101@pacific.net.sg> <4dc0cfea0712310842o49b24abdl9ec10b4af124e373@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > Good point. Most legacy s/w is in C++. I'm assuming from lack of comment > that C# is as yet an unborn language ;) > TIA, > Victor > > On Dec 31, 2007 12:28 PM, Erich Dollansky <oceanare@pacific.net.sg> > wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > Victor Subervi wrote: > > > toward a low-level language. I am not good in any :( I'm thinking > > Java's > > > > Assembler? > > > > > probably my best bet, just because there are more Java programmers out > > there > > > than any other language (I think). But what about C++ or C#? Your > > comments > > > > I would use a combination out of C and C++. > > > > Even if there are more Java programmers out there, they not have the > > experience of the most C/C++ programmers. > > > > Erich > > > >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4dc0cfea0712310842i6b24bbcaw3ab44d19a3bf96ef>