From owner-freebsd-hackers  Thu May 31  5:18:18 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Received: from proxon.bnc.net (proxon.bnc.net [62.225.99.6])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 069DD37B422
	for <hackers@freebsd.org>; Thu, 31 May 2001 05:18:16 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from noses@proxon.bnc.net)
Received: (from noses@localhost)
          by proxon.bnc.net (8.11.3/8.11.3) id f4VCID691023;
          Thu, 31 May 2001 14:18:13 +0200 (CEST)
          (envelope-from noses)
Date: Thu, 31 May 2001 14:18:13 +0200 (CEST)
Message-Id: <200105311218.f4VCID691023@proxon.bnc.net>
From: Noses <noses@noses.com>
To: hackers@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Real "technical comparison"
Organization: Noses' cave
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0105301555430.12540-100000@imladris.rielhome.conectiva>
User-Agent: tin/1.5.6-20000803 ("Dust") (UNIX) (FreeBSD/4.3-STABLE (i386))
Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <freebsd-hackers.FreeBSD.ORG>
List-Archive: <http://docs.freebsd.org/mail/> (Web Archive)
List-Help: <mailto:majordomo?subject=help> (List Instructions)
List-Subscribe: <mailto:majordomo?subject=subscribe%20freebsd-hackers>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo?subject=unsubscribe%20freebsd-hackers>
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

In article <Pine.LNX.4.21.0105301555430.12540-100000@imladris.rielhome.conectiva> you wrote:
> On Wed, 30 May 2001, Terry Lambert wrote:
>> I would suggest a better test would be to open _at least_ 250,000
>> connections to a server
> 
> That would certainly qualify for the "patently unreal" part, but I don't
> know what else you want to prove here.

Thank you for not telling it to one of my servers which is running around
with about 100000 concurrent connections biting its tail. I wouldn't like to
hurt its feelings. And I've got the feeling that it will have to bear a bit
more of that beating.


Noses.

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message