From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Oct 21 19:13:24 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5D2B16A4CF for ; Thu, 21 Oct 2004 19:13:24 +0000 (GMT) Received: from segfault-outgoing-helo.monkeys.com (segfault.monkeys.com [66.60.159.24]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B301643D55 for ; Thu, 21 Oct 2004 19:13:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rfg@monkeys.com) Received: from segfault-nmh-helo.monkeys.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by segfault.monkeys.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC6A654AC; Thu, 21 Oct 2004 12:13:23 -0700 (PDT) To: Igor Sysoev In-reply-to: Your message of Thu, 21 Oct 2004 09:37:07 +0400. <20041021091935.K17688@is.park.rambler.ru> Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2004 12:13:23 -0700 Message-ID: <93418.1098386003@monkeys.com> From: "Ronald F. Guilmette" cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: aio_connect ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2004 19:13:25 -0000 In message <20041021091935.K17688@is.park.rambler.ru>, you wrote: >I believe if you want to build a more maintainable, more adaptable, >more modularized program then you should avoid two things - the threads and >the signals. If you like to use a callback behaviour of the signals you could >easy implement it without any signal. OK. I'll bite. How?