From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 28 14:11:43 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2278416A41C; Tue, 28 Jun 2005 14:11:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from deischen@freebsd.org) Received: from mail.ntplx.net (mail.ntplx.net [204.213.176.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBA3643D55; Tue, 28 Jun 2005 14:11:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from deischen@freebsd.org) Received: from sea.ntplx.net (sea.ntplx.net [204.213.176.11]) by mail.ntplx.net (8.13.4/8.13.4/NETPLEX) with ESMTP id j5SEBcLB012119; Tue, 28 Jun 2005 10:11:39 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2005 10:11:31 -0400 (EDT) From: Daniel Eischen X-X-Sender: eischen@sea.ntplx.net To: Michael Nottebrock In-Reply-To: <200506281547.33134.lofi@freebsd.org> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS and Clam AntiVirus (mail.ntplx.net) Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: kpdf crashes with LIBPTHREAD_SYSTEM_SCOPE set (Was: Re: FreeBSD MySQL still WAY slower than Linux) X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Daniel Eischen List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2005 14:11:43 -0000 On Tue, 28 Jun 2005, Michael Nottebrock wrote: > On Tuesday, 28. June 2005 06:43, Daniel Eischen wrote: > > > I can't reproduce it in -current. > > > > -bash-2.05b$ uname -a > > FreeBSD orion 6.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 6.0-CURRENT #0: Thu May 5 13:29:41 EDT > > 2005 > > Yeah, you already said that before. So where do we go from here? Should I try > to get a backtrace of the crash? With gdb? Ktrace? Should I compile > libpthread of other parts of the system with special debug flags? Should I > report this on freebsd-threads instead? Or should I just let the issue go? What CFLAGS did you use to build your ports/system? Run it under gdb and see what you get. -- DE