From owner-freebsd-current Mon Dec 28 07:17:44 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id HAA09460 for freebsd-current-outgoing; Mon, 28 Dec 1998 07:17:44 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from flood.ping.uio.no (flood.ping.uio.no [129.240.78.31]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id HAA09451 for ; Mon, 28 Dec 1998 07:17:42 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from des@flood.ping.uio.no) Received: (from des@localhost) by flood.ping.uio.no (8.9.1/8.9.1) id QAA00168; Mon, 28 Dec 1998 16:17:24 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from des) To: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: CALL FOR FEEDBACK: inetd From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav Date: 28 Dec 1998 16:17:24 +0100 Message-ID: Lines: 9 X-Mailer: Gnus v5.5/Emacs 19.34 Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I just committed a patch to inetd (rev. 1.44 of inetd.c) which I hope fixes the "junk pointer: too low to make sense" bug mentioned in PR bin/8183. I'd appreciate if those of you who have experienced problems with inetd would tell me as quickly as possible if the patch alleviates those problems. DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@flood.ping.uio.no To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message