From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 10 15:02:45 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 294B2106566B; Mon, 10 Aug 2009 15:02:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from scf@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mail.farley.org (mail.farley.org [IPv6:2001:470:1f0f:20:2::11]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2D4D8FC20; Mon, 10 Aug 2009 15:02:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from thor.farley.org (HPooka@thor.farley.org [IPv6:2001:470:1f0f:20:1::5]) by mail.farley.org (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n7AF2hwj051586; Mon, 10 Aug 2009 10:02:43 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from scf@FreeBSD.org) Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 10:02:43 -0500 (CDT) From: "Sean C. Farley" To: Marc Fonvieille In-Reply-To: <20090810071850.GB1238@gothic.blackend.org> Message-ID: References: <20090725013500.GC62402@onelab2.iet.unipi.it> <20090725073805.GA11455@abigail.blackend.org> <20090806211401.GB2546@pollux.local.net> <68208453@h30.sp.ipt.ru> <20090809160121.GA1621@pollux.local.net> <00339944@bb.ipt.ru> <20090810071850.GB1238@gothic.blackend.org> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=4.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,NO_RELAYS autolearn=ham version=3.2.5 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on mail.farley.org Cc: freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: status of flash9/flash10 support in RELENG_7 ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 15:02:45 -0000 On Mon, 10 Aug 2009, Marc Fonvieille wrote: > On Sun, Aug 09, 2009 at 08:22:47PM +0400, Boris Samorodov wrote: >> >> Well, as for fc4 ports, Fedora Core 4 is unmaintained for a long time >> and there is no hope to get an updated version. The same seems to >> happen with f8 port. > > This is annoying cause it means default linux_base under 7.X is a "no > way" in future: I mean when some linux apps will be updated people > using 7.X and default linux_base may face up to issues. And on > another hand I understood that some missing sysctl calls etc. prevents > the switch to f10 under 7.X. So what is the good solution for the > future? I think at some point (MFC) after 7.2-RELEASE 7.x began working well enough to use F10 as the base. At least, GoogleEarth, UT99, Skype, Adobe Reader 8 (nspluginwrapper and standalone) and Flash (nspluginwrapper) work for me. There are some missing system calls, but I am not sure what applications will have trouble (not work as opposed to make warnings) without them. Sean -- scf@FreeBSD.org