From owner-freebsd-gnome Thu Dec 12 9:40:12 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EEF5B37B401 for ; Thu, 12 Dec 2002 09:40:10 -0800 (PST) Received: from gw.nectar.cc (gw.nectar.cc [208.42.49.153]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F69D43EA9 for ; Thu, 12 Dec 2002 09:40:10 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from nectar@nectar.cc) Received: from madman.nectar.cc (madman.nectar.cc [10.0.1.111]) by gw.nectar.cc (Postfix) with ESMTP id E36F310; Thu, 12 Dec 2002 11:40:09 -0600 (CST) Received: by madman.nectar.cc (Postfix, from userid 1001) id CCFCD5572; Thu, 12 Dec 2002 11:39:41 -0600 (CST) Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2002 11:39:41 -0600 From: "Jacques A. Vidrine" To: Joe Marcus Clarke Cc: James Pole , Mike Hoskins , freebsd-gnome@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Repeatable crash from nautilus2 Message-ID: <20021212173941.GB28544@madman.nectar.cc> Mail-Followup-To: "Jacques A. Vidrine" , Joe Marcus Clarke , James Pole , Mike Hoskins , freebsd-gnome@FreeBSD.org References: <20021211135451.G83245-100000@fubar.adept.org> <1039662104.233.7.camel@localhost> <20021212145509.GA13791@madman.nectar.cc> <1039710116.2413.8.camel@gyros> <20021212172708.GA28530@madman.nectar.cc> <1039714508.2413.27.camel@gyros> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1039714508.2413.27.camel@gyros> X-Url: http://www.celabo.org/ User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i-ja.1 Sender: owner-freebsd-gnome@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Thu, Dec 12, 2002 at 12:35:08PM -0500, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote: > The thumbnailing code is divided between JPEGs and other images. The > non-JPEGs are rendered in a pthread with a 128K stack size. > Therefore, > you can't omit libc_r in /etc/make.conf, I'm not sure what you mean by `omit libc_r in /etc/make.conf'. > and your CPU optimizations > might be causing thread weirdness. As I said, I not using any CPU optimizations. The world has been rebuilt. All ports have been rebuilt. The issue remains. It is quite a mystery. > It might be work doing a default > optimization compile with libc_r as well. I look forward to the > backtrace. I think all of us suffering from this problem are stuff until a backtrace can be produced. Cheers, -- Jacques A. Vidrine http://www.celabo.org/ NTT/Verio SME . FreeBSD UNIX . Heimdal Kerberos jvidrine@verio.net . nectar@FreeBSD.org . nectar@kth.se To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-gnome" in the body of the message