From owner-freebsd-geom@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 7 19:44:36 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E86916A403; Thu, 7 Dec 2006 19:44:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lulf@stud.ntnu.no) Received: from fri.itea.ntnu.no (fri.itea.ntnu.no [129.241.7.60]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2675543CB5; Thu, 7 Dec 2006 19:43:36 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lulf@stud.ntnu.no) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fri.itea.ntnu.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C2A88949; Thu, 7 Dec 2006 20:44:29 +0100 (CET) Received: from studby.ntnu.no (m044h.studby.ntnu.no [129.241.135.44]) by fri.itea.ntnu.no (Postfix) with ESMTP; Thu, 7 Dec 2006 20:44:29 +0100 (CET) Received: by studby.ntnu.no (Postfix, from userid 1001) id E544739956; Thu, 7 Dec 2006 20:44:31 +0100 (CET) Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2006 20:44:31 +0100 From: Ulf Lilleengen To: Lukas Ertl Message-ID: <20061207194431.GA6337@vimes.studby.ntnu.no> References: <20061124200302.GA3482@vimes.studby.ntnu.no> <20061124210503.F59901@korben.prv.univie.ac.at> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20061124210503.F59901@korben.prv.univie.ac.at> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i X-Content-Scanned: with sophos and spamassassin at mailgw.ntnu.no. Cc: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Gvinum patches for testing X-BeenThere: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GEOM-specific discussions and implementations List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Dec 2006 19:44:36 -0000 On Fri, Nov 24, 2006 at 09:05:51PM +0100, Lukas Ertl wrote: > On Fri, 24 Nov 2006, Ulf Lilleengen wrote: > > >And at last, it seems grog@ is kind of busy these days, so I have again no > >committer to review my changes, but I hope to get some more help from > >others to > >test it at least. Still, it would be nice if I could grab other available > >committers attention. Again, I welcome suggestions and complaints. > > Hey! > > Thanks for your effort, I'll have a look! > I have updated the gvinum_setstate.diff patch because i had a reduntant check of arguments because gctl_req_paraml would check it for me. -- Ulf Lilleengen