Date: Mon, 09 Dec 2002 15:50:12 +0100 From: Michael Schuster <michael.schuster@sun.com> To: Mikhail Teterin <mi+mx@aldan.algebra.com>, freebsd-sparc@freebsd.org Subject: [Fwd: why would Sparc be soo sloow?] Message-ID: <3DF4ADA4.77830BDB@sun.com>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
I wrote: > > Mikhail Teterin wrote: > > > > > = - other HW config aspects, like storage in use, etc for both (!) > > = machines, as well as characteristic of the application, such > > = as > > = - memory footprint > > = - I/O behaviour, etc. > > > > Very little -- all the program is doing is computations -- the CPU is > > the bottleneck on both machines. > > if this really is the case, patch 111722-01 may help you. a few tests showed that that's likely. > > Very suprising, for, according even to truss(1), the program makes no > > system calls at all You're seeing the effects of trap handling. HTH Michael Recursion, n.: see 'Recursion' To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-sparc" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3DF4ADA4.77830BDB>