Date: Fri, 11 Jun 1999 11:27:54 -0400 From: "I'Khala" <ikhala@phoenix.cl.msu.edu> To: Yiorgos Adamopoulos <adamo@dblab.ece.ntua.gr> Cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Quetion about kernel building on 3.2-stable Message-ID: <19990611112754.A20045@phoenix.cl.msu.edu> In-Reply-To: <19990610123521.A60043@dblab.ece.ntua.gr>; from Yiorgos Adamopoulos on Thu, Jun 10, 1999 at 12:35:21PM %2B0300 References: <19990609151945.A78024@phoenix.cl.msu.edu> <375ED60B.C871D6AC@rug.ac.be> <19990609171530.A1028@phoenix.cl.msu.edu> <19990610123521.A60043@dblab.ece.ntua.gr>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Quoting Yiorgos Adamopoulos (adamo@dblab.ece.ntua.gr): > On Wed, Jun 09, 1999 at 05:15:30PM -0400, I'Khala wrote: > > > > -r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 8736632 May 21 18:39 /kernel* > > Could this be the result of profiling/debugging options of some kind? Possibly, since I do have debugging and profiling options in my kernel. But it still begs the question, why so large. My 2.2.x kernels were never this large and my -current kernels are not this large even if options that can be kld's are statically built into the kernel. All my kernels have debugging and profiling options built in. > > -- > Yiorgos Adamopoulos -- #include <std/disclaimer.h> > adamo@dblab.ece.ntua.gr -- Knowledge and Data Base Systems Laboratory, NTUA > > > --adamo > KIEp lwWulm ECsEIt0 m9 CPEc B-x Ou LbM Sc++++++++++ T+ A4 H6o b2 D0 > #;^) -- I'Khala ikhala@msu.edu 308 Computer Laboratory ikhala@pager.msu.edu Michigan State University http://www.msu.edu/~ikhala East Lansing, MI 48824 +1.517.355.4500 x.151 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19990611112754.A20045>