From owner-freebsd-hackers  Mon Apr 14 11:06:42 1997
Return-Path: <owner-hackers>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id LAA02845
          for hackers-outgoing; Mon, 14 Apr 1997 11:06:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.cdsnet.net (mail.cdsnet.net [204.118.244.5])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id LAA02840
          for <hackers@freebsd.org>; Mon, 14 Apr 1997 11:06:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.cdsnet.net (mail.cdsnet.net [204.118.244.5])
          by mail.cdsnet.net (8.8.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id LAA16859
          for <hackers@freebsd.org>; Mon, 14 Apr 1997 11:06:38 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Mon, 14 Apr 1997 11:06:38 -0700 (PDT)
From: Jaye Mathisen  <mrcpu@cdsnet.net>
To: hackers@freebsd.org
Subject: ahc1/ahc0?
Message-ID: <Pine.NEB.3.95.970414105747.324A-100000@mail.cdsnet.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk



Argh.  

LINT says ahc0 provides support for 274X and 284X adapters.

ahc says it supports the 29/3940(U)(W) adapters, and motherboard based AIC
7870/7880 adapters.

But down below, it shows up as ahc1.

Is there some reason ahc is listed twice?  Is the note really wrong?  Is
there now a sep driver for 29XX vs 27XX devices?

I ask, because with the recent problems with the AHC driver, maybe they
were split to handle some pathological case or something...