From owner-freebsd-acpi@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 20 14:50:05 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-acpi@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66CF71065696 for ; Mon, 20 Sep 2010 14:50:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56A478FC23 for ; Mon, 20 Sep 2010 14:50:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id o8KEo5kR045694 for ; Mon, 20 Sep 2010 14:50:05 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id o8KEo5jo045693; Mon, 20 Sep 2010 14:50:05 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2010 14:50:05 GMT Message-Id: <201009201450.o8KEo5jo045693@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-acpi@FreeBSD.org From: Andriy Gapon Cc: Subject: Re: i386/135447: [i386] [request] Intel Core i7 and Nehalem-EP new features not supported X-BeenThere: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Andriy Gapon List-Id: ACPI and power management development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2010 14:50:05 -0000 The following reply was made to PR i386/135447; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Andriy Gapon To: Dmitry Kubov Cc: jh@freebsd.org, brucec@freebsd.org, bug-followup@freebsd.org Subject: Re: i386/135447: [i386] [request] Intel Core i7 and Nehalem-EP new features not supported Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2010 17:48:07 +0300 on 20/09/2010 17:41 Dmitry Kubov said the following: > > >> on 20/09/2010 17:06 Dmitry Kubov said the following: >>> Maybe I need some kind of powerd running? No any info about TurboBoost tune on >>> FreeBSD. >> So you do have the levels reported in cx_supported? >> This is not what you attached to the PR. And this is not what I tried to debug. >> I am not sure what changed in your environment, but you should have said that you >> have the those levels reported and not wasted my time on this. >> >> Please ask the above on questions@. > > Change is 7.2 upgraded to 8.1 Great! That was a wise decision on your part. But you should have told us/me that (e.g. followed up to your own PR). OK, now you can enable use of lower Cx states via hw.acpi.cpu.cx_lowest sysctl and the PR can be closed. -- Andriy Gapon