From owner-freebsd-hackers  Wed May 12 10: 2:10 1999
Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Received: from mail2.atl.bellsouth.net (mail2.atl.bellsouth.net [205.152.0.22])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5DD714CA3
	for <freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>; Wed, 12 May 1999 10:02:02 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from wghicks@bellsouth.net)
Received: from wghicks.bellsouth.net (host-209-214-69-111.atl.bellsouth.net [209.214.69.111])
	by mail2.atl.bellsouth.net (8.8.8-spamdog/8.8.5) with ESMTP id NAA28948;
	Wed, 12 May 1999 13:01:59 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from wghicks (wghicks@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by wghicks.bellsouth.net (8.9.3/8.9.2) with ESMTP id NAA09957;
	Wed, 12 May 1999 13:03:29 -0400 (EDT)
	(envelope-from wghicks@wghicks.bellsouth.net)
Message-Id: <199905121703.NAA09957@bellsouth.net>
To: podlipec@baynetworks.com (Mark Podlipec)
Cc: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG, wghicks@wghicks.bellsouth.net
Subject: Re: FreeBSD native xanim
In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 12 May 1999 10:47:10 EDT."
             <199905121447.KAA20102@pobox.engeast.BayNetworks.COM> 
Date: Wed, 12 May 1999 13:03:29 -0400
From: W Gerald Hicks <wghicks@bellsouth.net>
Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG


> I'd really rather have the cross-compilers.

Me too, but for other reasons.

If you are using CVS then the problems you mention of working
between systems will be greatly minimized.  Besides, we'd
really like to see you try FreeBSD  :-)

My major problem with the approach you are considering really
relates to quality control issues.

Have you earnestly tried to reason for release from NDA?

Sometimes it really works. :-)

Cheers,

Jerry Hicks
wghicks@bellsouth.net


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message