From owner-freebsd-hackers  Wed Jun 14 10:55:30 1995
Return-Path: hackers-owner
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id KAA16992
          for hackers-outgoing; Wed, 14 Jun 1995 10:55:30 -0700
Received: from ref.tfs.com (ref.tfs.com [140.145.254.251])
          by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id KAA16986
          for <freebsd-hackers@freefall.cdrom.com>; Wed, 14 Jun 1995 10:55:30 -0700
Received: (from julian@localhost) by ref.tfs.com (8.6.11/8.6.9) id KAA06766; Wed, 14 Jun 1995 10:55:13 -0700
From: Julian Elischer <julian@ref.tfs.com>
Message-Id: <199506141755.KAA06766@ref.tfs.com>
Subject: Re: ah1542 speed optimization
To: kuku@gilberto.physik.rwth-aachen.de (Christoph P. Kukulies)
Date: Wed, 14 Jun 1995 10:55:13 -0700 (PDT)
Cc: freebsd-hackers@freefall.cdrom.com
In-Reply-To: <199506140722.JAA23171@gilberto.physik.rwth-aachen.de> from "Christoph P. Kukulies" at Jun 14, 95 09:22:41 am
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24]
Content-Type: text
Content-Length: 700       
Sender: hackers-owner@FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> 
> 
> Why - and I'm refering to a previous mail upon Rod already answered
> and I didn't follow up immediately - does the ah1542 autoconfigure
> code, when probing for DMA speeds and it is saying 100ns OK, using
> 150ns, not fall back to the next nearest value, that is: 125 ns ?
> 
> (I was asking why the table aha_speeds did not show the
> 125 ns in that prev mail)

it won't fall back to an entry not in the table....

> 
> 
>  -Chris Christoph P. U. Kukulies kuku@gil.physik.rwth-aachen.de
> FreeBSD blues.physik.rwth-aachen.de 2.0-BUILT-19950606 FreeBSD 2.0-BUILT-1995
> 0606 #0: Tue Jun  6 19:13:32 MET DST 1995    kuku@blues.physik.rwth-aachen.de
> :/usr/src/sys/compile/BLUESGUS  i386
>