From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 11 13:01:09 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 343E51065687; Sun, 11 Mar 2012 13:01:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from utisoft@gmail.com) Received: from mail-bk0-f54.google.com (mail-bk0-f54.google.com [209.85.214.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 293DD8FC0A; Sun, 11 Mar 2012 13:01:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bkcjc3 with SMTP id jc3so2809185bkc.13 for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2012 06:01:07 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=/GL+SLAPzeaYGyOCEdZY1tHREYurDqV1H6bA2Cf3wYA=; b=dpupj4mERxMXLp3XRhQ6Vb1TQ4zJL0FccA9Jvrj8EDcsJbnHk6dS9foFXFmhzX62IV MiN8V02Q/kF8HCuxzwbW3wqY6Wmn4WazX7JcAIzNuR2L4S72IK/sAGF0IEj27v8NBzg0 IuOioBh8CuCVQ5KVfULMpvzgs2Zn035KHSXWMFlQj6vG839YofqOmm+MRj3MHIoUixEL 4TEnDlDghfczqTDEbR/DJiCS2a9EzEW3oE6YJ8iKO1Py9ao2ESKfRWVaNXyilC8wSl3G q0STfNHCLywhvp0TX4SVmoLMMjethdwpD3D5+AINq2fg1egKYaSx+Lp+2qfJRDvUj2vu CN3Q== Received: by 10.204.156.201 with SMTP id y9mr846586bkw.90.1331470867152; Sun, 11 Mar 2012 06:01:07 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: utisoft@gmail.com Received: by 10.204.202.142 with HTTP; Sun, 11 Mar 2012 06:00:37 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1331470527.25467.4.camel@z6000.lenzicasa> References: <4F5C950F.2020203@mailbox.sk> <201203110738.02969.lumiwa@gmail.com> <1331470527.25467.4.camel@z6000.lenzicasa> From: Chris Rees Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2012 13:00:37 +0000 X-Google-Sender-Auth: KfITkX5IDot2gjpWAW1hD3NJFN0 Message-ID: To: Sergio de Almeida Lenzi Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: ajtiM , Colin Percival , FreeBSD Mailing List Subject: Re: portsnap problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2012 13:01:09 -0000 On 11 March 2012 12:55, Sergio de Almeida Lenzi wr= ote: > Em Dom, 2012-03-11 =C3=A0s 07:38 -0500, ajtiM escreveu: > >> On Sunday 11 March 2012 07:05:35 Herby Voj=C4=8D=C3=ADk wrote: >> > Hello, >> > >> > for a day already, portsnap fetch seems not to fetch newest changes. >> > freshports shows lots of changes, port portsnap fetch says there >> > everything is up to date. >> > I checked that the ports are really newer in freshports than in my mac= hine. >> > I also removed everything in /usr/ports and /var/db/portsnap and issue= d >> > portsnap fetch extract, but it did not help. >> > >> > Maybe some job that creates patches for portsnap died? >> > > > Or just that ports system is "frozen" because of the 8.3 release??? > > Occam's razor: > > when you have two or more competing theories > that make exactly the same predictions, > the simpler one is the better. CC: portsnap maintainer Although that might be a reasonable explanation, it's much more likely that portsnap data is not being generated right now. Chris