From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 15 16:18:49 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3AB6516A4CE for ; Mon, 15 Mar 2004 16:18:49 -0800 (PST) Received: from fep03-mail.bloor.is.net.cable.rogers.com (fep03-mail.bloor.is.net.cable.rogers.com [66.185.86.73]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B154843D48 for ; Mon, 15 Mar 2004 16:18:46 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mikej@rogers.com) Received: from [192.168.0.1] ([63.139.3.63]) by fep03-mail.bloor.is.net.cable.rogers.comESMTP <20040316001843.CLLF411419.fep03-mail.bloor.is.net.cable.rogers.com@[192.168.0.1]>; Mon, 15 Mar 2004 19:18:43 -0500 Received: from 192.168.0.200 (SquirrelMail authenticated user mikej) by 192.168.0.1 with HTTP; Mon, 15 Mar 2004 19:18:43 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <2662.192.168.0.200.1079396323.squirrel@192.168.0.1> In-Reply-To: <20040316000153.GA73860@router.laiers.local> References: <2650.192.168.0.200.1079393908.squirrel@192.168.0.1> <20040316000153.GA73860@router.laiers.local> Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2004 19:18:43 -0500 (EST) From: "Mike Jakubik" To: "Max Laier" User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 Importance: Normal X-Authentication-Info: Submitted using SMTP AUTH LOGIN at fep03-mail.bloor.is.net.cable.rogers.com from [63.139.3.63] using ID at Mon, 15 Mar 2004 19:18:43 -0500 cc: Mike Jakubik cc: net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Byte counters reset at ~4GB X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2004 00:18:49 -0000 Max Laier said: > There is now: pf comes with 64bit statistic counters. For now you can put > them on one interface only, but in future version there will be more > flexible statistics. Additionally there are many accounting programs out > there which utilize various existing (32bit) counters or the [i]pf[w] > interfaces: sysutils/ipa or net-mgmt/ipacctd to name just two off the top > of > my head. Well that's good to hear. Too bad the base system can’t implement something like this. Does pf not incur the same performance penalty as Brooks and Kris pointed out?