From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Fri Aug 2 20:27:09 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5BF8BAB06 for ; Fri, 2 Aug 2019 20:27:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lee@adminart.net) Received: from mo6-p01-ob.smtp.rzone.de (mo6-p01-ob.smtp.rzone.de [IPv6:2a01:238:20a:202:5301::9]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "*.smtp.rzone.de", Issuer "TeleSec ServerPass Class 2 CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 460dxS4mnJz4Sgw for ; Fri, 2 Aug 2019 20:27:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lee@adminart.net) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1564777625; s=strato-dkim-0002; d=adminart.net; h=References:Message-ID:Date:In-Reply-To:Subject:Cc:To:From: X-RZG-CLASS-ID:X-RZG-AUTH:From:Subject:Sender; bh=vS0SLRaqoHDnkl1f7c7SRx62Tw3f5AFLvOdwE5g3xzo=; b=d75CYrF2DsrXba/7HzCAZBO/4fVmhwG4sbjONZTmTXUZV9ZXwKlZl9TuMiknq5DcP2 BgDLQkjf/YXjfgU70kvn8d3rpZ/zmYBOJTRhAFN4DrdV9l98+mLS02BQ1CiZWkJWIVj6 Jz8Uu6ZZ0BHCt6ZOhc9/yYQ5tcu63R2tr+CeQf2UGCcvEFNgnlEZi48D988Xtp60CK6G Sh4dNgXG8gp0CjSLKE2gsR62y1Lm5K7Nn2+t1C35dHbd+MNynO/5BXioRFCeVzWNNqw0 LosMwmEKwpPJRhXaXFG9R/Fw9MmDX2F6YHqUxjb38rQz6bQuckoQRHnMHWsoD4TBnYGh 3YWQ== X-RZG-AUTH: ":O2kGeEG7b/pS1FS4THaxjVF9w0vVgfQ9xGcjwO5WMRo5c+h5ceMqQWZ3yrBp+ARdaXvxIDf7nlw=" X-RZG-CLASS-ID: mo00 Received: from himinbjorg.adminart.net by smtp.strato.de (RZmta 44.24 DYNA|AUTH) with ESMTPSA id e0059dv72KR5ZB9 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (curve secp521r1 with 521 ECDH bits, eq. 15360 bits RSA)) (Client did not present a certificate); Fri, 2 Aug 2019 22:27:05 +0200 (CEST) Received: from toy.adminart.net ([192.168.3.55]) by himinbjorg.adminart.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1hte8m-00007E-Rm; Fri, 02 Aug 2019 22:27:04 +0200 Received: from lee by toy.adminart.net with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1hte8m-0001Jh-QB; Fri, 02 Aug 2019 22:27:04 +0200 From: hw To: Kamila =?utf-8?B?U291xI1rb3bDoQ==?= Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: for how long can I expect the update servers to be slow? In-Reply-To: ("Kamila \=\?utf-8\?B\?U291xI1rb3bDoSIncw\=\=\?\= message of "Wed, 31 Jul 2019 10:28:29 +0200") Date: Fri, 02 Aug 2019 22:26:47 +0200 Organization: my virtual residence Message-ID: <87pnln8gag.fsf@toy.adminart.net> References: <875znkcxlo.fsf@toy.adminart.net> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 460dxS4mnJz4Sgw X-Spamd-Bar: / Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=adminart.net header.s=strato-dkim-0002 header.b=d75CYrF2; dmarc=none; spf=none (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of lee@adminart.net has no SPF policy when checking 2a01:238:20a:202:5301::9) smtp.mailfrom=lee@adminart.net X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-0.69 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[adminart.net:s=strato-dkim-0002]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[adminart.net]; HAS_ORG_HEADER(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[adminart.net:+]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.85)[-0.848,0]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[]; FORGED_SENDER(0.30)[hw@adminart.net,lee@adminart.net]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW(-0.10)[9.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.1.0.3.5.2.0.2.0.a.0.2.0.8.3.2.0.1.0.a.2.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.1]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:6724, ipnet:2a01:238::/32, country:DE]; FROM_NEQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[hw@adminart.net,lee@adminart.net]; IP_SCORE(-0.74)[ipnet: 2a01:238::/32(-3.26), asn: 6724(-0.45), country: DE(-0.01)] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Aug 2019 20:27:10 -0000 Kamila Sou=C4=8Dkov=C3=A1 writes: > Hi, > >> are the update servers still overwhelmed, or is there something else >> wrong? >> >> >> root@cdebsd:~ # pkg install xrdp emacs-nox cde >> [...] >> Number of packages to be installed: 116 >> >> The process will require 2 GiB more space. >> 335 MiB to be downloaded. >> >> Proceed with this action? [y/N]: y >> [1/116] Fetching xrdp-0.9.10_2,1.txz: 100% 404 KiB 46.0kB/s 00:09 >> [2/116] Fetching emacs-nox-26.2,3.txz: 15% 6 MiB 8.2kB/s 15:03 > ETA >> [0] 0:pkg* "cdebsd.adminart.net" 23:46 > 29-Jul-19 >> >> >> About 20 minutes after starting this, the emacs-nox package has 90% >> arrived ... > Random guess: any chance you are going over IPv6 here? In my location, I > always get reasonable speeds over IPv4, but often (though not always) get > very low speeds over IPv6. I have not had much time to investigate this > issue, but it seems that it doesn't depend on the ISP in my case, as > tunnelling over different IPv6 providers produces the same results. I'm forced to use the bad router from the ISP because there is no alternative due to the technology they're using, and despite I'm getting ip6 addresses, that stupid router doesn't support anything, and thus it can't do prefix delegation. So I can't use ipv6. The bridge the FreeBSD VM is connected to has, IIRC, only a link-local ipv6 address (starts with fe80) that was assinged automatically. If that would cause problems, I'd expect other downloads to be affected as well, and they aren't.