From owner-freebsd-usb@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 31 08:20:03 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-usb@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA1BE1065672 for ; Fri, 31 Jul 2009 08:20:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7FCD8FC17 for ; Fri, 31 Jul 2009 08:20:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n6V8K3WC085260 for ; Fri, 31 Jul 2009 08:20:03 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id n6V8K3nP085258; Fri, 31 Jul 2009 08:20:03 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2009 08:20:03 GMT Message-Id: <200907310820.n6V8K3nP085258@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-usb@FreeBSD.org From: Hans Petter Selasky Cc: Subject: Re: usb/137189: [usb][patch] create and use sysctl nodes for HID report descriptors X-BeenThere: freebsd-usb@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Hans Petter Selasky List-Id: FreeBSD support for USB List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2009 08:20:04 -0000 The following reply was made to PR usb/137189; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Hans Petter Selasky To: rea-fbsd@codelabs.ru Cc: bug-followup@freebsd.org, freebsd-usb@freebsd.org Subject: Re: usb/137189: [usb][patch] create and use sysctl nodes for HID report descriptors Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2009 09:19:03 +0200 On Thursday 30 July 2009 22:38:12 Eygene Ryabinkin wrote: > Hans Petter, good day. > > Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 07:40:27PM +0400, Eygene Ryabinkin wrote: > > HPS wrote: > > > > Why do you dislike the sysctl approach? It is simple and reliable. > > > > > > It's duplicating access to data. There is not that much wrong about > > > it, except it will not work if the device is of another kind. I.E. you > > > would have to patch the HID sysctl node into every driver accessing > > > HID descriptors? > > > > Just now -- yes, I'll need it. But probably I can move this > > functionality into the USB bus level -- it will automatically create > > this sysctl node for all HID children and will dispose it on the detach. > > usb_probe_and_attach() is a candidate for such functionality. Will it > > be bad? > > OK, attached is the reworked version of the sysctl patch: it now creates > the needed nodes automatically (though they still can be created by > explicit call from the driver, as in uhid(4)). As a bonus, kernel got the > ability to install per-USB class post-attach and pre-detach handlers, so > we can do some class-specific things for every driver. What do you think > of it? Hi, I think it's too much code to doo too little, and adds extra complexity, and that doing this via libusb would be much more generic. --HPS