From owner-freebsd-hackers Wed Jul 5 17:17:34 1995 Return-Path: hackers-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id RAA13048 for hackers-outgoing; Wed, 5 Jul 1995 17:17:34 -0700 Received: from alpha.xerox.com (alpha.Xerox.COM [13.1.64.93]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with SMTP id RAA13042 for ; Wed, 5 Jul 1995 17:17:33 -0700 Received: from crevenia.parc.xerox.com ([13.2.116.11]) by alpha.xerox.com with SMTP id <14474(5)>; Wed, 5 Jul 1995 17:16:59 PDT Received: from localhost by crevenia.parc.xerox.com with SMTP id <49860>; Wed, 5 Jul 1995 17:16:56 -0700 X-Mailer: exmh version 1.6.1 5/23/95 To: Warner Losh cc: davidg@root.com, hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: another reason not to change 0.0.0.0 into 192.0.0.1 in PPP In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 04 Jul 95 20:26:31 PDT." <199507050326.VAA22797@rover.village.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Wed, 5 Jul 1995 17:16:40 PDT From: Bill Fenner Message-Id: <95Jul5.171656pdt.49860@crevenia.parc.xerox.com> Sender: hackers-owner@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk In message <199507050326.VAA22797@rover.village.org> you write: >I think that the original intent was to use 192.2.0.1, which is >officially a test network and someone got confused :-). I think BBN would be pretty surprised to find that out: Bolt Beranek and Newman Inc. (NET-BBN-CNET4) 70 Fawcett Street Cambridge, MA 02138 Netname: BBN-CNET4 Netnumber: 192.2.0.0 IANA (RESERVED-2) Netname: RESERVED Netnumber: 192.0.0.0 Bill