From owner-freebsd-bugs Mon Dec 11 12:40:10 2000 From owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 11 12:40:09 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91CD137B400 for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2000 12:40:08 -0800 (PST) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.11.1/8.11.1) id eBBKe8T74791; Mon, 11 Dec 2000 12:40:08 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from gnats) Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2000 12:40:08 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <200012112040.eBBKe8T74791@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Cc: From: Josef Karthauser Subject: Re: conf/23419: 'make buildkernel' doesn't work in isolation from 'make buildworld' Reply-To: Josef Karthauser Sender: gnats@FreeBSD.org Sender: owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org The following reply was made to PR conf/23419; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Josef Karthauser To: Ruslan Ermilov Cc: joe@tao.org.uk, bug-followup@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: conf/23419: 'make buildkernel' doesn't work in isolation from 'make buildworld' Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2000 20:33:49 +0000 On Mon, Dec 11, 2000 at 10:57:41AM +0200, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > Because it is not supposed to. The whole purpose of buildkernel was > that it should use the same (up-to-date) set of tools that is used > for the rest of the world. The correct and established sequence is > ``buildworld'' followed by ``buildkernel''. Shouldn't it then build the tools that it needs if they've not already been built? Who's to say that last world built was of the same generation as the kernel that's being built? Here's the problem. I want to build kernels for picobsd in a different object directory, so as to not conflict with any other kernel builds. Joe -- Josef Karthauser [joe@FreeBSD.org, joe@tao.org.uk] ......... FreeBSD: The power to change the world ........ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message