From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Mar 4 9:26:32 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mail2.uniserve.com (mail2.uniserve.com [204.244.156.10]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09E1437B718 for ; Sun, 4 Mar 2001 09:26:28 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tom@uniserve.com) Received: from mail2.uniserve.com ([204.244.156.10]) by mail2.uniserve.com with esmtp (Exim 3.13 #1) id 14ZcGs-0008mG-00; Sun, 04 Mar 2001 09:26:15 -0800 Date: Sun, 4 Mar 2001 09:26:14 -0800 (PST) From: Tom X-Sender: tom@athena.uniserve.ca To: Mattias Pantzare Cc: Martti Kuparinen , freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: major resolver problems in -STABLE In-Reply-To: <200103041147.MAA03917@mother.ludd.luth.se> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Sun, 4 Mar 2001, Mattias Pantzare wrote: > No, that is simply not true. hostname is _not_ related to DNS. DNS names > IP adresses, an IP adress names a interface, not a host. > > You can set hostname to whatever you think looks nice. > > If you have applications that depend on hostname beeing a FQDN then they are > broken. No. "hostname" should be resolvable. Lots of applications want this (ie. sendmail). Tom To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message